<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Microsoft2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microsoft2.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microsoft2.net</link>
	<description>How Microsoft Plans to Stay Relevant in the Post-Gates Era</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-955</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft's reticence to talk about the product. Some believe that Windows Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky's policy of being "translucent" rather than "transparent" is a good one -- and point to confusion and disappointment with Windows Vista as proof that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Microsoft&#8217;s reticence to talk about the product. Some believe that Windows Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky&#8217;s policy of being &#8220;translucent&#8221; rather than &#8220;transparent&#8221; is a good one &#8212; and point to confusion and disappointment with Windows Vista as proof that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by Vista update: Why waiting for Windows 7 is no kind of strategy at all. &#171; Microsoft @ SYNNEX Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista update: Why waiting for Windows 7 is no kind of strategy at all. &#171; Microsoft @ SYNNEX Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] to XP until Windows 7 comes out, don&#8217;t hold your breath.  Scuttlebutt from Microsoft&#8217;s Steve Sinofsky&#8217;s camp points to a late 2010 release date for Windows 7.  Sure, other industry bloggers may like to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to XP until Windows 7 comes out, don&#8217;t hold your breath.  Scuttlebutt from Microsoft&#8217;s Steve Sinofsky&#8217;s camp points to a late 2010 release date for Windows 7.  Sure, other industry bloggers may like to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Microsoft learn to innovate? by Quikboy</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/05/09/can-microsoft-learn-to-innovate/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Quikboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=19#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Isn't the Office 07' UI, Surface, Photosynth, Mediaroom, Xbox Live, Media Center, among other things innovative? 

I thought they were cool as well as innovative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the Office 07&#8242; UI, Surface, Photosynth, Mediaroom, Xbox Live, Media Center, among other things innovative? </p>
<p>I thought they were cool as well as innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by Satisfy Me : Steven Sinofsky speaks with CNET's Ina Fried about Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Satisfy Me : Steven Sinofsky speaks with CNET's Ina Fried about Windows 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] year, Sinofsky penned a blog to his Windows unit co-workers, explaining his public silence and urging them to follow his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] year, Sinofsky penned a blog to his Windows unit co-workers, explaining his public silence and urging them to follow his [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition : Sinofsky Breaks Silence on Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition : Sinofsky Breaks Silence on Windows 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] push; or maybe it was hastily put together in response to Mary Jo Foley's new book, in which she published the memo that replaced the traditionally clear panes of Windows for &#34;translucent&#34; stained glass. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] push; or maybe it was hastily put together in response to Mary Jo Foley&#8217;s new book, in which she published the memo that replaced the traditionally clear panes of Windows for &quot;translucent&quot; stained glass. I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 08:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] at D6. Not surprisingly, no word back. (Not even a comment  like &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you read the Sinofsky memo on translucency vs. transparency that you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] at D6. Not surprisingly, no word back. (Not even a comment  like &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you read the Sinofsky memo on translucency vs. transparency that you [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by Windows 7: The info lockdown continues &#124; Gizmo Hacker</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7: The info lockdown continues &#124; Gizmo Hacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s been nearly a year since Windows/Windows Live Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky made the new information-sharing policy clear in a Microsoft-internal blog post (a full copy of which I&#8217;m running on the site for my Microsoft ...). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s been nearly a year since Windows/Windows Live Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky made the new information-sharing policy clear in a Microsoft-internal blog post (a full copy of which I&#8217;m running on the site for my Microsoft &#8230;). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by Ed Bott Fails us</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott Fails us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] its plans then say Apple, but at the same time I think objecting to Microsoft&#8217;s new &#8216;translucency&#8217; policy is really just a lot of people being frustrated because they can no longer feel like they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] its plans then say Apple, but at the same time I think objecting to Microsoft&#8217;s new &#8216;translucency&#8217; policy is really just a lot of people being frustrated because they can no longer feel like they [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translucency vs. Transparency Blog Post by All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/04/27/translucency-vs-transparency-blog-post/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=13#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s been almost a year since Windows/Windows Live Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky made the new information-sharing policy clear in a Microsoft-internal blog post (a full copy of which I&#8217;m running on the site for my Microsoft ...). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s been almost a year since Windows/Windows Live Engineering Chief Steven Sinofsky made the new information-sharing policy clear in a Microsoft-internal blog post (a full copy of which I&#8217;m running on the site for my Microsoft &#8230;). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo: All that hedging for nothing by Twinloops blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysts don&#8217;t really have crystal balls</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoft2.net/2008/05/05/yahoo-all-that-hedging-for-nothing/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Twinloops blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysts don&#8217;t really have crystal balls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoft2.net/?p=18#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] about a new book about Microsoft by Mary Jo Foley. Foley posted about the key issue on her own blog as follows: As I mentioned in the conclusion of Microsoft 2.0, I had just submitted the final [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] about a new book about Microsoft by Mary Jo Foley. Foley posted about the key issue on her own blog as follows: As I mentioned in the conclusion of Microsoft 2.0, I had just submitted the final [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
